Eating lamb and veal often sparks an ethical debate around whether it is cruel or not While humans have been raising and eating young sheep and cows for thousands of years, some argue that killing and eating baby animals is unjustifiable In this article, we’ll explore both sides of the argument and look at the ethical considerations around eating lamb and veal.
What is Veal and Lamb?
First, let’s define exactly what we mean by lamb and veal.
-
Lamb refers to the meat of young domestic sheep under one year old Lambs are typically slaughtered between 3 and 10 months old Their meat is pale pink and more tender than regular mutton from older sheep,
-
Veal comes from young calves, usually male dairy cows, who are slaughtered at 16-18 weeks old. Veal calves are fed a low-iron milk diet which keeps their meat pale pink and tender.
So in both cases, the animals are still young – some would say babies or children – when killed for their meat. This raises moral questions around whether it is ethical to eat animals so young.
The Case Against Eating Lamb and Veal
There are several main ethical arguments against eating veal and lamb
Killing babies
The clearest objection is that killing young animals feels inherently cruel. Lambs and calves are still children, developing physically and mentally. Some see eating veal and lamb as no different morally from eating puppies or kittens. The young age of the animals adds to the tragedy of their death.
Separating mothers and babies
To produce veal and lamb, farmers take baby calves and lambs away from their mothers, typically within a day or two of birth. This causes distress and grief for both mother and baby who share a strong maternal bond. The mothers cry and search for their stolen babies. The babies lose the vital maternal care, nutrition and companionship they need for healthy development. This separation seems profoundly unethical.
Restricted living conditions
Veal calves are kept in tiny crates unable to move, deprived of their mother’s milk, company and outdoors access. This intensive confinement causes the calves stress and physical issues like anemia and muscle deterioration. Lambs also often live in crowded feedlots with limited freedom. The restrictive conditions seem cruel given their young age and needs.
Killing helpless, trusting creatures
Baby animals are dependent, helpless and trusting of humans for care and protection. However, the farmers they trust betray and kill the young creatures. This breach of trust and killing of innocent, vulnerable beings seems morally corrupt. The lambs and calves are unable to defend themselves making the killing even more unjust.
Wasteful killing of babies
Veal and lamb production involves killing animals shortly after birth before they live even a fraction of their natural lifespan. This seems a wasteful squandering of the young animals’ lives purely for gastronomic pleasure. Some argue it would be more ethical to kill older sheep and cows who have lived full lives.
Environmental impacts
Intensive veal and lamb farming has negative environmental impacts including methane emissions from the herd, and effluent runoff polluting waterways. As well as ethical arguments, some oppose veal and lamb on environmental grounds.
Arguments For Eating Lamb and Veal
While there are clearly strong ethical objections to lamb and veal, there are also counter-arguments in favor:
Humans naturally eat animals
Lambs and calves are produced by farmers as meat sources for humans. While we should aim to give them decent lives, humans eating animals is a natural part of our omnivorous food chain. If we didn’t eat the young lambs and calves, the farmers wouldn’t bother birthing and raising them in the first place.
Quick, humane slaughter
Modern slaughtering practices aim to minimize suffering. Young lambs and calves raised for veal are killed quickly and humanely, avoiding the health issues and decline that come with old age. Some argue it is more ethical to give an animal a short but carefree life than subjecting them to the pains of aging.
Vital food source
Meat from young animals provides important nutrition for humans including protein, iron and zinc. Veal and lamb offer an ethical red meat choice. While some object to any use of animals for food, for those who do choose to eat meat, lamb and veal are efficient, nutritious options.
Regulations protect welfare
In many countries, strict regulations protect the welfare of lambs and calves, requiring pain relief during procedures like castration and sufficient space allowances. Farmers must adhere to ethical guidelines around feed, water, shelter and humane transport and slaughter. Welfare laws prevent the worst cruelties like intensive veal crates.
Traditional practices
Farming veal calves and lambs is a longstanding agricultural practice in many cultures. Banning traditional farm products like lamb and veal risks threatening the heritage, livelihoods and food security of farming communities who ethically produce it.
Population control
Without a veal industry, thousands of male dairy calves would be slaughtered at birth as waste products. Veal production gives value to these calves, who otherwise have little economic purpose in the dairy industry. Lambs also allow farmers to sustainably manage sheep populations.
Weighing the Arguments
There are good points on both sides of the debate around the ethics of eating veal and lamb. Each individual must weigh the evidence and arguments and decide what feels morally right for them.
For those who choose to avoid lamb and veal due to moral objections, there are many ethical alternatives. Beef, chicken, turkey or plant-based fake meats can provide similar nutrition. However, substitutes also raise welfare and environmental issues we must consider.
Ultimately, the ethics of eating veal and lamb are complex. Raising lambs and calves humanely and killing them quickly to provide nutritious food for humans is a natural cycle. But as a society we should also critically examine traditional practices and have empathy for baby animals dependent on our mercy. More ethical farming practices, reduced meat consumption and humane slaughter regulations may help balance the complex factors in this debate.
What do you think? Is eating the meat of young lambs and calves justifiable? Where should we draw ethical lines around using animals for food? The debate around veal and lamb will likely continue as we shape farming practices and diets to balance human needs and animal welfare. But each of us can inform ourselves on the issues and decide where we stand based on our own moral values.
Why You Should Ditch Dairy
FAQ
Why is veal cruel but lamb isn’t?
Is eating veal cruel?
Is lamb more humane than veal?
Is there such a thing as humane veal?
Is it cruel to eat lamb?
Eating lamb is cruel because the standard procedures used to slaughter these animals are painful and unethical. In most farms, lambs often endure inhumane living conditions and are killed at six months old. However, it is possible to eat ethically-sourced lamb by buying straight from farmers that you know treat their animals well.
Can I eat lamb instead of beef if I have high cholesterol?
Both lamb and beef have saturated fats and may raise the levels of bad cholesterol in the blood. Lamb generally contains more fat content when compared to beef or pork. Consumption of both lamb and beef should be in moderation.
Is veal cruel?
Veal is another type of meat that is cruel for similar reasons. Veal comes from baby cows that are slaughtered, sometimes immediately after birth. However, this process is even crueler than lamb, and the reasons will shock you. You can read all about it here:
Is veal more expensive than lamb?
Generally veal is more expensive than beef, which is the adult counterpart, and its price range is closer to that of lamb. But it is important to remember that veal and lamb are totally different meats that come from totally different livestock animals. Is veal cruel? You may have heard that veal has an awful reputation.